View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0026668 | AI War 2 | Balance Issue | Mar 8, 2022 10:54 pm | Mar 9, 2022 12:13 am | |
Reporter | pmm5000_1 | Assigned To | BadgerBadger | ||
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 4.002 Macrophage Live! | ||||
Fixed in Version | 4.003 A Bit Too Chromatic Horrifying | ||||
Summary | 0026668: Hacking Rift for Essence not Worthwhile | ||||
Description | It did occur to me that I scoffed at the idea of only gaining 15 essence in exchange for giving up either a new unit or transformation or...does anyone actually take the increase to bodyguard count? I wouldn't. Then again, I'm also the kinda of person who wouldn't take 3x the turrets for this one system instead of adding it to all systems. This is a long game. I play for the long haul and plan accordingly. Which is why 200 essence which is just 7 essence shy of a full blown Mark 7 Major Necropolis is extremely attractive choice, but also...admittedly too much. Like I would definitely take the option for 200, but balance is important. While I think the perfect number would actually be 150 Essence. That's a Mark 4 Necrofleet plus a Mark 5 Major Necropolis which can get a pretty sizable troop count including an extra bone dragon (if you have it). Granted. All you need is 107 to actually mark the Major Necropolis to 5 (from scratch), but also you could use that extra essence for expansion and what not. Still would make that option extremely attractive at 150. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
This is a ludicrous amount of Essence to ask for. I will not go anywhere near 150. |
|
I have increased the number to 30 |
|
Yeah. It's a ludicrous. But it IS the perfect number for making it an instant pick over ANYTHING else the rift has to offer. 30...is debatable. That's 6 defensive, or 3 Minor, or 1 Mark 2 Major, or a few other low level options for expansion purposes. I feel like I'm playing with coins now trying to get the best value for my buck. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Mar 8, 2022 10:54 pm | pmm5000_1 | New Issue | |
Mar 8, 2022 11:38 pm | BadgerBadger | Note Added: 0065262 | |
Mar 8, 2022 11:43 pm | BadgerBadger | Assigned To | => BadgerBadger |
Mar 8, 2022 11:43 pm | BadgerBadger | Status | new => resolved |
Mar 8, 2022 11:43 pm | BadgerBadger | Resolution | open => fixed |
Mar 8, 2022 11:43 pm | BadgerBadger | Fixed in Version | => 4.003 A Bit Too Chromatic Horrifying |
Mar 8, 2022 11:43 pm | BadgerBadger | Note Added: 0065267 | |
Mar 9, 2022 12:13 am | pmm5000_1 | Note Added: 0065277 |