|
|
Distant Planet selection (with simple click). Scorpion is currently selected. Golem's selection is additive; it shouldn't. DistantPlanet.jpg (59,515 bytes) |
|
|
Current Planet selection (with simple click). Scorpion is currently selected. I click on the fleet 1/2/0/4, it deselects the previously selected fleet in Scorpion and we end with 4 selected. Golem's selection remains; it should be cleaned. CurrentPlanet.jpg (58,505 bytes) |
|
|
I select a fleet on the planet view with a simple click/or/drag 'n drop (not using shortcuts or galaxy map). It is selected. I ctrl+click the wormhole to traverse it. Annotation 2019-10-12 064017.jpg (12,410 bytes) |
|
|
The fleet is not selected anymore. I have to reselect it to unload my troops or give another order. Annotation 2019-10-12 064045.jpg (8,073 bytes) |
|
|
Thanks! * Fixed a variety of selection issues on the galaxy map with fleets not always deselecting properly and instead sometimes being additive, etc. ** It's actually a number of bugs all in one, because basically there was some older per-planet logic that was still being used here (and on planets) from back when cross-planet selection was only kinda-sorta a thing. Now it all works consistently galaxy-wide, or at least should. But if you see any remaining (or new) bugs, please let us know. * Previously, hitting the escape key would just clear your selection on the current planet. Now it clears the selection on all the planets, as it should. ** We didn't see the "when a fleet traverse a wormhole, it's selection is lost. This issue only occurs if the selection was made in the planet view. If you select the fleet on the galaxy map, it works correctly." issue, but probably what it really was was the above one. Or something fixed in the batch right before that. If it's still something anyone else sees, please let us know. |
|
|
> We didn't see the "when a fleet traverse a wormhole, it's selection is lost. This issue only occurs if the selection was made in the planet view. If you select the fleet on the galaxy map, it works correctly." issue Just re-tested to make sure, the issue is still present in the 901 version. I'll open a new issue bug |
|
|
Perfect, thanks for opening 0021811. That's a big help! |
- Anonymous
