View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryLast Update
0005975AI War 1 / ClassicSuggestion - Balance TweaksFeb 17, 2012 6:42 am
ReporterHellishFiend Assigned To 
Status consideringResolutionopen 
Product Version5.025 
Summary0005975: Regenerator Golem behavior (Neinzul Ships, Spire Maw)
DescriptionI recommend that the Regenerator Golem ignore Neinzul ships as possible targets for regeneration, as they are not economical to regenerate, and essentially forces the player to choose between using the golem or using the neinzul ships, as both in the same battle just makes things worse for you.

I also recommend altering the behavior of how it regenerates the Spire Maw. Currently, it regenerates the maw with it's swallowed ships still inside. I think it makes more sense for the ships to be ejected upon the death of the Maw. The maw does have a lot of HP and takes a huge toll on the golem, so I guess it could be argued that this should stay the same. Just wanted to call attention to it.
Tagsgolem
Internal WeightFeature Suggestion

Activities

ArcDM

Feb 17, 2012 12:21 am

reporter   ~0019279

I can see ways that Neinzul can be used with the Regenerator Golem but I would prefer to be without such a minor strategy in favor of practicality

Spikey00

Feb 17, 2012 12:52 am

reporter   ~0019281

Also throwing it out there that high-HP ships like mirrors also really hurt it. Maybe it just needs a flat self-damage?

HellishFiend

Feb 17, 2012 12:59 am

reporter   ~0019282

Flat self-damage probably wouldnt work well, since it is useful to regenerate ships ranging from the basic Fighter all the way to a Spire Dreadnought. But yeah, I'm sure there are other ships that arent economical to regenerate with the current hp-based system.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
Feb 17, 2012 12:15 am HellishFiend New Issue
Feb 17, 2012 12:21 am ArcDM Note Added: 0019279
Feb 17, 2012 12:29 am HellishFiend Tag Attached: golem
Feb 17, 2012 12:52 am Spikey00 Note Added: 0019281
Feb 17, 2012 12:59 am HellishFiend Note Added: 0019282
Feb 17, 2012 6:42 am tigersfan Internal Weight => Feature Suggestion
Feb 17, 2012 6:42 am tigersfan Status new => considering