View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryLast Update
0025185AI War 2Bug - GameplayFeb 28, 2022 1:06 pm
Reportercrawlers Assigned ToChris_McElligottPark  
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Product Version3.100 Commander Vision 
Summary0025185: MP skivari didn't have epistyle that can build infastructure on both players
DescriptionOne player (this time host) didn't get an epistyle that can build infrastructure, so their growth is really stunted.

In other games, sometimes a player wouldnt get an epistyle at all, but I don't have a save of that.
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

crawlers

Jun 6, 2021 5:07 pm

reporter  

1.save (654,418 bytes)
1.savemet (142 bytes)   
OC
104528849
632
w3
<color=#ff3fd9>Brutal </color> Geneticist
Difficulty 9
0
<color=#e5e5e5>crawlers</color>, <color=#7d12b3>Driftwood</color>
1.savemet (142 bytes)   

BadgerBadger

Jun 6, 2021 5:44 pm

manager   ~0061985

For MP, you really need one svikari per player. So the game lobby should ask "Which player is this svikari joining?".

BadgerBadger

Jun 6, 2021 5:45 pm

manager   ~0061986

Last edited: Jun 6, 2021 5:46 pm

Sappers will probably have a similar problem. In general, player-allied factions that have real infrastructure should be one-per-player with an option for "who to join"

crawlers

Jun 6, 2021 6:31 pm

reporter   ~0061987

With one skivari per player, wouldnt it create a horridly overpowered mass of multicolored skivari if player empires linked up and each one built a copy of their infastructure?

BadgerBadger

Jun 8, 2021 1:15 am

manager   ~0061993

That is a potential problem, yes. But modifying svikari to be fully distributed is not going to happen.

crawlers

Jun 8, 2021 11:59 am

reporter   ~0061997

Perhaps add a way to add a planet cap on infrastructure, so if 2 skivari try to build there only one will get away with it. Perhaps the skivari assigned to a particular player would have priority on building in their worlds, so one skivari doesnt just take over everything.

Chris_McElligottPark

Feb 28, 2022 1:06 pm

administrator   ~0064892

Should be solved at this point!

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
Jun 6, 2021 5:07 pm crawlers New Issue
Jun 6, 2021 5:07 pm crawlers File Added: 1.save
Jun 6, 2021 5:07 pm crawlers File Added: 1.savemet
Jun 6, 2021 5:44 pm BadgerBadger Note Added: 0061985
Jun 6, 2021 5:45 pm BadgerBadger Note Added: 0061986
Jun 6, 2021 5:45 pm BadgerBadger Assigned To => Chris_McElligottPark
Jun 6, 2021 5:45 pm BadgerBadger Status new => assigned
Jun 6, 2021 5:46 pm BadgerBadger Note Edited: 0061986
Jun 6, 2021 6:31 pm crawlers Note Added: 0061987
Jun 8, 2021 1:15 am BadgerBadger Note Added: 0061993
Jun 8, 2021 11:59 am crawlers Note Added: 0061997
Feb 28, 2022 1:06 pm Chris_McElligottPark Status assigned => resolved
Feb 28, 2022 1:06 pm Chris_McElligottPark Resolution open => fixed
Feb 28, 2022 1:06 pm Chris_McElligottPark Note Added: 0064892