View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002641 | AI War 1 / Classic | Suggestion - Balance Tweaks | Jan 24, 2011 10:38 pm | Dec 5, 2011 11:23 am | |
Reporter | chemical_art | Assigned To | |||
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
Product Version | 4.073 | ||||
Summary | 0002641: AI Zombie Guardians - Very, very strong compared to other guardians | ||||
Description | In my current game, I have stumbled for the first time zombie guardians. Upon examination oftheir stats, I realized there are much, much stronger then other guardians of their level. These ships have the potential to cripple any attack upon an AI eye, and are otherwise able to cause much more grievous harm then their other AI brethren. I request to bring the Zombie guardian's stats to be more in line with other AI guardians. Their very high offense + zombie status is very dangerous. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Internal Weight | |||||
|
I think that their buff in attack power followed suit with the other reclaimers' buff in attack power, so they can actually reclaim under the new reclamation mechanics. They may have gone too far with this particular one though. |
|
That thing should probably get a damage nerf and the reclaim multiplier that the nanoswarm has (or the reclaim threshold just needs to be lowered in general). |
|
Reclaim threshold needs to be lowered in general [i]in addition to[/i] the zombie guardian getting an attack power nerf. They already had enough damage to reclaim units before the damage buff on reclaimers. |
|
I like having some extra-dangerous guardians - most guardians just end up steamrollered, so having one or two types that you really have to look out for is a good thing. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Jan 24, 2011 10:38 pm | chemical_art | New Issue | |
Jan 24, 2011 10:42 pm | TechSY730 | Note Added: 0009664 | |
Jan 25, 2011 10:02 am | KDR_11k | Note Added: 0009667 | |
Jan 25, 2011 1:41 pm | Draco18s | Note Added: 0009675 | |
Dec 5, 2011 11:23 am | Atomjack | Note Added: 0017683 |