View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryLast Update
0003848AI War 1 / ClassicSuggestion - Balance TweaksOct 19, 2012 10:44 am
ReporterToll Assigned To 
Severityminor 
Status consideringResolutionopen 
Product Version5.017 
Summary0003848: Decoy Drones could do with a bit of a buff
DescriptionCurrently, the description for the Decoy Drone says: "Tough, high-health vessel with no significant guns". Its health is 200k and no armour, which really goes completely against that; a Mk. I Fighter has 162.400 health and 300 armour, which probably makes it a tougher target. Considering the Decoy Drone is experimental, I would expect a much higher health in the 2m-range, perhaps with middling armour as well.
TagsNo tags attached.
Internal WeightFeature Suggestion

Relationships

related to 0005679 considering Decoy drones 
related to 0000854 resolvedChris_McElligottPark Decoy Drone Health/Armor possible wrong 
related to 0003199 new Decoy drones' stats don't match their description 

Activities

TechSY730

Sep 19, 2011 9:11 am

reporter   ~0013243

2M sounds like a bit much, considering how much they can interfere with battles. 1M may be about right.

But in any case, as they are now, they go down too fast.

Drin

Sep 19, 2011 9:19 am

reporter   ~0013244

Be careful what you wish for. Support corps sends a healthy number of these guys with attack waves.. That attract all the fire from every ship firing at friendlies near it. So 10 ships fire.. Redirect to the drone.. 700 ships fire.. To the drone. Make them too tough and there might be a problem when ai spams them. Ie 10+ a wave means atleast 10 salvos of your gunfire not hitting what you need it to hit.

TechSY730

Sep 19, 2011 10:29 am

reporter   ~0013248

Last edited: Sep 19, 2011 10:29 am

.5M then?

Wait, what is their ship cap? That is an important piece of information before we can start trying to balance them.

Toll

Sep 23, 2011 2:37 pm

reporter   ~0013447

The ship cap for decoy drones is 9.

TechSY730

Sep 23, 2011 2:42 pm

reporter   ~0013448

Wow, that's pretty low. I guess they need to be decently durable in order to justify that ship cap.

Toll

Oct 19, 2012 10:44 am

reporter   ~0028727

One-year bump, goooo!

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
Sep 18, 2011 2:06 pm Toll New Issue
Sep 19, 2011 9:11 am TechSY730 Note Added: 0013243
Sep 19, 2011 9:19 am Drin Note Added: 0013244
Sep 19, 2011 10:29 am TechSY730 Note Added: 0013248
Sep 19, 2011 10:29 am TechSY730 Note Edited: 0013248
Sep 19, 2011 10:29 am TechSY730 Note Edited: 0013248
Sep 23, 2011 2:37 pm Toll Note Added: 0013447
Sep 23, 2011 2:42 pm TechSY730 Note Added: 0013448
Sep 23, 2011 4:14 pm tigersfan Internal Weight => Feature Suggestion
Sep 23, 2011 4:14 pm tigersfan Status new => considering
Oct 19, 2012 10:44 am Toll Note Added: 0028727
Oct 19, 2012 10:44 am Toll Relationship added related to 0005679
Oct 19, 2012 10:44 am Toll Relationship added related to 0000854
Oct 19, 2012 10:44 am Toll Relationship added related to 0003199